Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of your parent department of your petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and spend the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of your respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment about the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that while the crime of murder was set up, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for considering mitigating factors during sentencing.
From the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments play a vital role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. Just one these types of notable amendment that has garnered attention would be the latest revision of Section 489-F in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to make it acceptable to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
The ruling of the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until or Until possibly new law website is created, or a higher court rules differently.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
P.C. Liability of petitioners for that claimed offences would be determined via the figured out trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value from the material manufactured before the same. Till then, case of
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered about the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who's father on the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner is undoubtedly an eyewkness in the incidence.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
PACER allows any person with an account to search and locate appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for your PACER account.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions during the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it's important that the case set up the application on the precautionary principle where there is actually a menace to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations with the State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.
Stacy, a tenant in a very duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not supplied her ample notice before raising her rent, citing a different state legislation that needs a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that the new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.